Is Overpopulation the Problem?

Members of the Sierra Club are in the midst of balloting over their organization’s position on immigration – whether to further restrict immigration to limit population growth in the United States.  It’s a controversial topic to say the least.

Before voting, however, they may want to read "Fewer: How the New Demography of Depopulation Will Shape Our Future" by Ben Wattenberg.  In this book Wattenberg argues that the global decline in fertility/birth rates will ultimately – this century – lead to depopulation not overpopulation.  He also argues that the negative economic consequences of depopulation will be cushioned in the United States because of our more liberal immigration policies.

Immigration and overpopulation may not be the real problem in the long-term.

UPDATE: 4/26/05 –  The Associated Press reports that the members of the Sierra Club rejected the anti-immigration policy:

"Sierra Club members rejected a change in the group’s immigration policy that would have advocated reducing migration to the United States as a way to lessen the environmental consequences of population growth.

The proposal was defeated by nearly 84 percent of the 122,308 members who voted, the club announced in a statement. About 16 percent of the club’s more than 750,000 members cast ballots during voting that began in early March."

Contra Costa Times Editor to Blog

Contra Costa Times editor Chris Lopez writes in today’s paper – After Deadline -that he’s started a weblog to:

"…provide a window into the editor’s office of this newspaper and some insight into the thinking that leads to our front page and how the newspaper as a whole works."

He also reports that others at the Times have been and will be writing other blogs in the future.  I also commend him for admitting that traditional newspapers are concerned about changes in the way people get their information.  However, the Times is falling way behind – especially in an era when most the of stories I read in the Times I can find in other more accessible sources.

For example, I read the New York Times and San Francisco Chronicle through my RSS reader – NewsGator.  I can’t read the Contra Costa Times that way because they don’t provide a RSS feed.  For a while I found a tool that let me "scrape" certain sections of the CCT site, but now that’s just too much work.  [For the record I also subcribe to the paper version of the CCT].  The Times and the rest of the Knight-Ridder papers need to get on the RSS bandwagon.

For those of you who do use a RSS reader – I’ve figured out how to get the feed to this new information source – add this URL to your reader:

http://editorchrislopez.blogspot.com/atom.xml

The Nastiest Commute

Erin Hallissy writes about "The Nastiest Commute" in today’s San Francisco Chronicle covering the Census Bureau’s study of average commute times in various regions of the country.  The bureau claims the average commute in Contra Costa is 32.1 minutes and that about 5 percent of us spend up to 90 minutes getting to work.  Erin quotes a number of residents who are skeptical of the numbers.

I know our traffic congestion is politically intolerable.  But what would have happened if job centers had not decentralized throughout the Bay Area over the past 30 years?  If all or most of the jobs had stayed in Oakland or San Francisco wouldn’t things be far worse? 

The Message or The Messaging?

Joshua Green has written an interesting article entitled "It Isn’t the Message, Stupid" in the Atlantic Monthly.  It details the Democratic Party’s reassessment after the last election and whether the electoral losses were the result of positions on issues or how Democratic candidates explained their positions to voters.

Of local interest is the role Congressman George Miller played in advancing the argument that it was a problem of messaging rather than the message.  Really?  Guess I better read the book George finds so convincing…